🔗 Share this article

This is a glowing story in a publication that Trump has consistently praised – except for one issue. The cover picture, he stated, ""might be the most terrible in history".

Time's tribute to Donald Trump's part in facilitating a ceasefire in Gaza, headlining its early November edition, was accompanied by a image of the president shot from a low angle while the sun shining from the back.

The effect, Trump claims, is ""extremely poor".

"Time wrote a relatively good story about me, but the picture may be the most awful ever", the president posted on his social media platform.

“My hair was ‘disappeared’, and then there was an object above my head that appeared as a hovering crown, but very tiny. Really weird! I have always hated being photographed from below, but this is a extremely poor image, and it deserves to be called out. Why did they choose this, and why?”

The president has expressed obvious his ambition to be pictured on Time’s cover and achieved this four times last year. This fixation has made it as far as the president's resorts – years ago, the magazine asked him to remove mocked up covers exhibited in a few of his establishments.

This issue's photograph was captured by a photographer for Bloomberg at the White House on the fifth of October.

The shot's viewpoint did no favours for Trump’s chin and neck – an opening that the governor of California Newsom did not miss, with the governor's office tweeting a version with the offending area pixelated.

{The living Israeli hostages detained in Gaza have been liberated under the opening part of Trump's ceasefire agreement, alongside a release of Palestinian detainees. This agreement might turn into a signature achievement of Trump's second term, and it might signify a key shift for that part of the world.

At the same time, a defence of his portrayal has been offered by a surprising origin: the communications chief at Moscow's diplomatic office came forward to criticise the "self-incriminating" picture decision.

"It’s astonishing: a photo reveals far more about those who chose it than about the person in it. Only disturbed individuals, people driven by hatred and animosity –possibly even deviants – could have selected such an image", Maria Zakharova posted on the messaging platform.

In light of the positive pictures of Biden that the periodical used on the cover, notwithstanding his health issues, the story is simply self-incriminating for the magazine", she noted.

The response to Trump’s questions – what did the editors intend, and why? – could be related to innovatively depicting a feeling of authority stated by Carly Earl, an Australian publication's photo editor.

The photograph technically is professionally taken," she says. "They chose this shot because they wanted the president to look heroic. Gazing upward gives a sense of their importance and Trump’s face actually looks reflective and almost somewhat divine. It's rare you see pictures of him in such a serene moment – the picture feels tender."

The president's hair appears to “disappear” because the light from behind has washed out that area of the image, creating a halo effect, she says. And, while the article's title pairs nicely with Trump’s expression in the image, "one cannot constantly gratify the subject matter."

"No one likes being shot from underneath, and while all of the artistic aspects of the image are highly effective, the visual appeal are not complimentary."

The news outlet contacted the magazine for feedback.