🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create different wards – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.